IPLYR serves both plaintiffs (forensic reports against AI labs) and AI labs (defense audits). This is deliberate — the same forensic methods belong on both sides of the table. The architecture below is how we keep that posture credible.
Plaintiff-side forensic teams and AI-lab defense teams operate in separate operational silos with distinct credentials, data stores, and case-management systems. No personnel rotate between silos within an active matter window.
Every new engagement runs against an internal conflicts register before retention. Adverse-party, related-party, and substantially-related-matter checks are performed and logged.
IPLYR publishes a quarterly conflict-disclosure report listing categories of engagements taken in each silo, with counts and modality breakdowns. Named-party data is withheld where confidentiality requires.
If a downstream conflict surfaces mid-engagement, the affected silo recuses and reassigns or refunds. An independent ombudsperson is reachable directly for confidential concerns.
